Collectivism And Individualism : How Cultures Affect Supermarkets?

objective of this research is evaluation of the impact of culture in contact with individualism and collectivism on the purchasing intention in supermarkets. Structured research findings highlight that satisfaction of customers as well as evaluation of individualism and collectivism positive impact purchase intentions. Among various motivational variable as culture is to be considered as a critical element required for understanding consumer behavior. Among cultural variations and multiple dimensions impact in operations trend in supermarkets it can be highlighted that individualism vs collectivism acquired better part of the attention from researchers (Han, 2017). Researchers argued that the self-concept of people can be defined either in context with endo group or as independent entities who are detached from groups. Individualism vs collectivism is considered as quite broad construct for measurement of appropriate means followed by suggestion of its measurement at individual level of analysis.

For marketing assignment help in Australia student take help from SourceEssay online experts.

Discussion

In connection to the widespread debate between individualism and collectivism it can be clearly articulated that personality dimensions of idiocentrism-allcentrism should be considered as the construct at individual level which has been corresponding to the construct of individualism vs collectivism at the cultural level. Idiocentrism-allcentrism might also be examined by means of individual definitions of self as well as structure of personal objectives as well as the kinds of relationship emphasized by individuals and if the personal attitude or the social norms are considered as moral is necessary during guiding different aspects of individual behaviour. Researchers have also considered different variations of idiocentrism-allcentrism in connection to the vertically or horizontally intrinsic aspects of them (Kitirattarkarn, Araujo and Neijens, 2019). These are related with the power distance variation.

In an opinion of essay typer the dimensions of individualism and collectivism at cultural level relates to the way in which individuals for save and adhere value with the specific relative to groups. Individualist societies are mainly USA as well as UK and Germany among others as well. These societies emphasize great value like achievement as well as recognition and so on in contrast to collectivist societies prevailing mostly in major countries the like Mexico or Peru or Chile where there is a strong emphasis on values like family security followed by responsibility as well as conformity to the social norms and so on. One of the important elements in collectivist culture is that individuals might experience the normative pressure for confirmation to the objectives of collectivist in groups like family or tribe or religious group. The in group in context with the collectivist society try to participate more in these kinds of incorporated and tightly associated group slide family or tribes. However the in group for the individual is society are considered to be loosely associated groups like co-workers or a social class. In connection with the subordination to personal objectives to that of the in group goals the individuals in collectivist society will try to participate more in the improve activities and remain more concerned with the in-group interests and feel the compulsion to confirm with the in-group opinion as well. Researchers highlight that analyzing this construct at social level should help in involving study of the desirable behavior for societal members which are called norms as well as prescribed behaviour of the individuals relative with each other which are called the rolls along with the goals and principles which motivate individuals and are known as the values (Shavitt and Barnes, 2020). This is actually based on the assumption that individuals in any individual stick Society have some specific set of normal as well as the role and values which will be distinctively individually stick in their nature and therefore those will be either individual referring to personal or collective referring to communal. Therefore individualism and collectivism construct as highlighted in various theories like that of Hofstede cultural dimension and so on might be treated as a form of Dakota me revolving around the major conflict existing between personal objectives as well as in group objectives.

Empirical research evidence examines individualism and collectivism at respective individual level and identify spill or display individualist tendency light focusing mainly on personal goals more than in group goals and people exhibiting collectivist tendency have specific traits. This week is more evident when the same are analysed in connection to the consumer related behaviour. For evidence the video centric behave in a way which enable their private self for realising achievement which is purchasing well-deserved clothing items for personal self and so on. In contrast the public self might purchase specific status-oriented products which are outward demonstration of the success achieved by them following the social hierarchy and standard account into compliance to the laws the associated in group which is the credibility and the compliance to observe and follow the standards of some social and ethical behavior of pertaining to a specific social section (Fanet al., 2018). The purchase of similar clothing might be interpreted in a different way if there is anallocentric private self is fulfilling respective sense of belonging with employee purchasing clothing for fulfillment of the personal security goals. In the same way they have a public shelf which will also be motivated to exhibit compliance with local customers by means of purchase of items which will help in establishing conformity with social expectations. In UK based supermarkets individualist culture is more dominant. Researches highlight that individualist for collective behavior of individuals depend basically on examining of any mediating variable of interest attempting to establish connection between individual behavior with the cultural level phenomenon in values. This implies that people do not always behave strictly in individualist or collectivist way but exercise individualist and collectivist behavior on the basis of the motivational goes associated with purchases. However it is expected that the individuals might in cage in the purchasing behavior on the basis of individual values (Lee, 2017). These values like that of achievement or self-gratification or pleasure seeking are evident in the purchasing patterns in supermarkets as there is amalgamation of product of multiple price range and multiple categories under the same domain. Therefore we find people purchase it for their achievement or for their self-gratification and even for pleasure seeking when they are at least conforming or opposing in group girls. However when there is an any kind of common grouping associated with purchasing habits to become easy to accomplish objective like shelf storage in supermarkets under respective product categories. It can also be articulated that individual is two values are often found with more prominence in all purchase behavior and the same is exhibited in the supermarket purchasing decisions in UK. Nevertheless past research evidence highlighted that at individual levels of allocentrism-idiocentrism which has been successful in identification of parallel variations in individualism and collectivism and there's still exists limitations in application because of the assumptions like that of the customers trade-off between personal as well as in group objectives.

According to online assignment writer the individualist culture of a person has significant impact on their respective thought process and behavior. Considering the fact that the UK is a country that has predominantly been operating their super markets on the basis of preferences of individual is culture according to the horticultural model this is an important aspect to be discussed. Since it is very influential on how people perceive the aspects around them and tries to associate themselves as individual within the surrounding context and make decisions accordingly it is critical to play a role in determination of how and why they should consume specific goods and services. Therefore it has a great deal to do a determination of the marketing phenomenon and objective approach in marketing activities to people with the context to dealing with their individualist mind said. Cultural prohibitions against the consumption of products like alcohol or meat or the cultural preferences in context to clothing style make it easy in understanding some buying patterns. Nevertheless these are large parameters with inbuilt diversities within them (Hanet al., 2017). The cultural events like that of household size or role of gender groups in managing households still impact on who buys which product or what scope and element of the item from supermarkets. Because of the fact that there is a dominant individualist culture in UK based supermarkets and the consumers shopping preferences some other very subtle elements need to be considered. These are also cultural elements like that of time intuition. It tends to whether customers prefer focusing on past or present or future. In this regard fast references or fast and allergy of item style or product price specification or other factors related to the product are brought into context by customers when they purchased products in supermarkets (Rahman, 2019). Their expect that there should be influence of element of online shopping like trust and social interaction.

Researches highlight that human personality is definitely very and that variety in composition limit up to which individual is considered respective influence of their cultures into account. Society is like that of UK is comparatively family oriented than US culture however it does not signify that their individual Easter purchasing patterns are disturbed. Nevertheless social disruption because of globalisation and rapid expansion of communication after the incoming of social media has never the less they rejected the strength in violation of cultural norms. If someone are found to be violating cultural norms and doing something new it takes very less time to design new trend out of the same and then sanction wider social impressive behavior. It becomes handy and it risky to consider whether to resist the trend to flow or not considering how super market sales and marketing might be impacted by the same. Hence it can be understood that individuals are easily influenced by impact of others behavior. Therefore it might not be scheduled but should be considered as a kind of collectivist norm even in individualist approach. To some extent culture should be simply considered what comes naturally to people (Luet al., 2018). Nevertheless external influence cannot be withheld if the natural context of appeal is considered in this case. However the aspect of individualism in the culture of supermarket shopping in UK is that people pickup what fits their own value and belief system and what they see others doing following at least a thin line of trend. Culture impacts what is justified as well as normal and desirable. However frequent afternoon of the same is a resemblance to individual is culture which is why shot stock filing for High Street fashion brands like Burberry or they are popular in UK with the short shelf life and rapid shelf space exchange and rapid clothing line shopping with new styles introduced by brands like Zara every 3 to 4 weeks. Retailers asking consumers to swim against social currents make it difficult for them in selecting services. This is because irrespective of scattering to a highly individualist society people require some aspect of resemblance with any element of societal impact. Therefore it is a better practice to make possible for people to join dots and make it easy for them to select products within their comfort zone. It is only important for the upfront employees to make people believe that they share the same comfort zone with other people so that they are convinced to make immediate and prompt purchasing decisions. On one hand people are mostly favoured in thinking whether it will feed their personal need and on the other hand it also makes them evaluate whether others have found it beneficial or not however the latter aspect is quite late in their thought process and the same is easily tinted bye verbal interference of upfront line of staff in supermarkets in UK (Banerjee and Chai, 2019). Same kind of individual East culture is evident in the supermarkets of USA as well. In contrast eastern society and preferably middle East as well as southeast Asia exhibit better collectivist culture. Trend and fashion sensations are there for popularized. Other than that variables as well as consumables and utility items can also be trendified in such areas.

To understand collectivism and individualism in details students can avail online dissertation help service from SourceEssay experts.

Cultural Elements

Now the question is which specific cultural elements would influence the purchasing behaviour. There are various significant aspects in cultural that can be analysed and has been analysed by the cultural researchers over the consistent time period. These in specific incorporates the youth orientation followed by long term versus short term orientation as well as masculinity versus femininity as well as the power distance index which also includes individualism vs collectivism.

The fact that the collectivist culture in Asian consumers is greater is highlighted by the instance that with increase in age in impulsive purchasing reduces among Asian customers. Nevertheless in UK impulsiveness of shopping is not reduced with age. This is because age-based fears of missing out aspects are inculcated in the marketing activities in UK based supermarkets. Researchers have also articulated that there are cultural elements like that of risk avoidance orientation which tree the critical role in influencing the impulse buying behaviour of consumers. In this regard it convert accumulated that risk avoidance is a spontaneous element of absolute individual concerned where there is no collectivist or group thought in the mind (Han and Guo, 2018). This is not impacted by any collective or sectoral thought. There for cultural factors can also be expressed in various unexpected baton. The time orientation for example in a culture can find expression in the way for the level up to which it is taller and about lateness as well as in efficiency and the way in which people living as a part of the culture manage their time. In this regard not only from the aspect of the consumers but also from the perspective of the front line employees in supermarkets it can be analysed. Us is considered as one of the most future-oriented countries where shopping habits and supermarket purchasing pattern and are considered to be similar as well as akin (Hornikx and de Groot, 2017). People in that country adhere great value with people being busy and the fast-paced lifestyle. In contrast France is considered to be more in the moment. This is the reason why the experiences are emphasized more in shopping in supermarket in France. In this regard customers should be provided with great variety and the luxury and epiphanies are greater in comparison to utility-based shot and limited space design in USA supermarkets. The later helps people to get what they need mostly and the design are developed with incorporating elements of purchase which are mostly favoured and demanded by people in a specific residential domain. The walking patterns in regard with shopping cultures in these two countries are also different. On one hand USA based customers to their requirement and fever the advices accepted from the shopkeepers regarding the tenure as well as other features of the product and in contrast the customers in France look for heritage of the brand or the designated a social value associated with the product they are purchasing. In this regard it could be articulated that there are still some cultures where collectivist approaches absolutely and neglect any negative Vibes which might be ushered upon positive individualism have to be taken into account (Hanet al., 2019). For evidence even if the individual people are trying to reflect their spontaneity and timeliness they would be hindered by the kind of delay they would have to travel experience because of delay in train and traffic and so on.

Marketing Impact

There are a significant number of examples with marketing which respects and work in context with specific cultural norm. Motorbike marketing can be a good domain for understanding concepts. In the western countries, motorbikes are perceived as ultimate individual product and the marketing messages which are used for sales of motorbikes fit in prevailing culture as well as encourage and revert the individualist self-fulfillment. Why if we move on to a more collectivist culture we will find motorbikes sold differently (Cheong and Mohammed-Baksh, 2020). The idea is more of a family motorbike or that of a heavy-duty motorbike which might seem ludicrous to Western bikers however it is a practical choice in Asian markets which are based on collectivist perceptions. According to cultural context the consumers are likely to make purchase is on the basis of how much it will be beneficial for the wider family or a social group. For evidence in a common Indian advertisement we find heavy duty motorcycles being used for transferring of elderly and poor people who generally cannot cover great distances in underdeveloped rural areas by road walking. Therefore the societal context is a very popular proof in connection to the collectivist theme. It is quite tough to get into the mindset of a totally different culture specifically for brand managers trying to persuade new audience to change the purchasing behaviour. In this regard it is also important to understand cultural fundamentals in one way for initiating journey of discovery when we enter into a new market. There has been a large number of researches in this context however translation of research into actionable insight for brand always remains challenge (Schrank and Running, 2018). This challenge is for visual weather in individual or a collectivist culture. This is the reason why many brands fail to successful expanded to New Market if they have to change into a collectivist culture from individualist culture or vice versa.

To know more how cultures affect supermarkets, you can also take assistance from SourcEssay Online assignment help Sydney experts whenever you want.

Conclusion

In conclusion it will be highlighted that individualist culture prevails in the UK-based supermarket and the research study has a critical established how shopping decision as well as a marketing patterns are moderated by this element of Hofstede cultural dimensions. On the contrary the proper difference is existing in connection with the collectivist culture and the surrounding marketing proposition of supermarkets in those regions have been well articulated in this research study. The factor of individuality is however still impacted by social or cultural or societal norm and trend in this culture of globalisation. Nevertheless rapidly changing cultural and preference patterns are primary factors which potentially impact the supermarkets and product differentiation policy of supermarkets in UK (Leonhardt, Pezzuti and Namkoong, 2020).

Reference List

Banerjee, S. and Chai, L., 2019. Effect of individualism on online user ratings: theory and evidence. Journal of Global Marketing, 32(5), pp.377-398.

Cheong, H.J. and Mohammed-Baksh, S., 2020. US and Korean consumers: A cross-cultural examination of product information-seeking and-giving. Journal of Promotion Management, 26(6), pp.893-910.

Fan, A., Shen, H., Wu, L., Mattila, A.S. and Bilgihan, A., 2018. Whom do we trust? Cultural differences in consumer responses to online recommendations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

Han, C.M. and Guo, C., 2018. How consumer ethnocentrism (CET), ethnocentric marketing, and consumer individualism affect ethnocentric behavior in China. Journal of Global Marketing, 31(5), pp.324-338.

Han, C.M., 2017. Individualism, collectivism, and consumer animosity in emerging Asia: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Consumer Marketing.

Han, H., Kiatkawsin, K., Kim, W. and Lee, S., 2017. Investigating customer loyalty formation for wellness spa: Individualism vs. collectivism. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 67, pp.11-23.

Han, J., Fang, M., Ye, S., Chen, C., Wan, Q. and Qian, X., 2019. Using Decision Tree to Predict Response Rates of Consumer Satisfaction, Attitude, and Loyalty Surveys. Sustainability, 11(8), p.2306.

Hornikx, J. and de Groot, E., 2017. Cultural values adapted to individualism–collectivism in advertising in Western Europe: An experimental and meta-analytical approach. International Communication Gazette, 79(3), pp.298-316.

Kitirattarkarn, G.P., Araujo, T. and Neijens, P., 2019. Challenging traditional culture? How personal and national collectivism-individualism moderates the effects of content characteristics and social relationships on consumer engagement with brand-related user-generated content. Journal of Advertising, 48(2), pp.197-214.

Lee, Y.K., 2017. A comparative study of green purchase intention between Korean and Chinese consumers: The moderating role of collectivism. Sustainability, 9(10), p.1930.

Leonhardt, J.M., Pezzuti, T. and Namkoong, J.E., 2020. We’re not so different: Collectivism increases perceived homophily, trust, and seeking user-generated product information. Journal of Business Research, 112, pp.160-169.

Lu, Q.S., Pattnaik, C., Xiao, J. and Voola, R., 2018. Cross-national variation in consumers' retail channel selection in a multichannel environment: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Journal of Business Research, 86, pp.321-332.

Rahman, S.U., 2019. Differences in horizontally individualist and vertically collectivist consumers' environmental behaviour: a regulatory focus perspective. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 11(1), pp.73-88.

Schrank, Z. and Running, K., 2018. Individualist and collectivist consumer motivations in local organic food markets. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(1), pp.184-201.

Shavitt, S. and Barnes, A.J., 2020. Culture and the consumer journey. Journal of Retailing, 96(1), pp.40-54.