Human Resource Management
HRMT20024, T2 2018 - Assessment 2 Annotated Bibliography Guidelines
Assessment
|
You
are required to compile an Annotated bibliography of 5 peer-reviewed journal
|
|||||
Task
|
articles.
|
|||||
Step 1. Select an industry sector.
|
||||||
Read the Assessment 3 Essay task and identify which sector you will
study for
|
||||||
Assessments
2 and 3 (e.g. agriculture; construction; financial services; health care;
|
||||||
hospitality;
manufacturing; mining; retail; transport).
|
||||||
Step 2. Undertake research of the recent
academic literature since 2013.
|
||||||
Identify five (5) academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to
the
|
||||||
Assessment
3 Essay topic. It is suggested that you align your selected articles with
|
||||||
the
unit themes from Weeks 3 to 5 (e.g. job design, HR planning, recruitment and
|
||||||
selection).
It is recommended that you undertake your research via the online
|
||||||
‘search’ of CQUniversity Library. You cannot use articles from your
Assessment 1
|
||||||
presentation for Assessment 2.
|
||||||
Step 3. Write 2 paragraphs on each article
(400 words)
|
||||||
For
each journal article, you are to write approximately 400 words in two
|
||||||
paragraphs.
The first paragraph will summarise the main ideas of the article,
|
||||||
identifying
the hypothesis, purpose, research methodology and conclusions. The
|
||||||
second
paragraph will identify how you will use that article in relation to the
|
||||||
Assessment
3 Essay.
|
||||||
Step 4. Use an appropriate format
|
||||||
Present
your Annotated bibliography in a format similar to that provided below. For
|
||||||
more
information, see the library guide for writing an annotated bibliography.
|
||||||
Sample format Introduction (100
words)
Identify which sector you have chosen, and
briefly outline the topics you have selected for this annotated bibliography
Article 1 (400 words)
Reference. [Insert the full reference here, in APA style] Key
words: [insert the key words from the article]
Para 1. Summarise the main ideas of the article, identifying the hypothesis, purpose,
research methodology and conclusions.
This
article examines [explain …]. The purpose/research question of the article is [explain…].
The research methodology is [explain …] The article finds/concludes [summarise]
Para 2 Critique the article, and tell us how it is
useful in your study.
While
this study applies to the public sector, its findings are useful in my study of
xyz sector because [explain …]. I will use these findings to analyse my sector
[explain how …].
Then repeat for your next 4 articles
Submitting All assessments must be submitted through the
Moodle site. No email submissions will be accepted. All assessments submitted
electronically through Moodle must be through the Student Portal http://my.cqu.edu.au
• Failure to submit
electronically will be taken as a failure to submit and therefore a zero (0)
score will apply to the specific assessment. No assessment coversheet is needed
to be attached while submitting through Moodle
Plagiarism Copy detection software (TurnitIn) is used in
this course and work found in contravention of the copying and plagiarism rules
will be investigated. Penalties apply in the case of proven instances of
copying, plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Please check the following links
to know more about TurnitIn: http://turnitin.com/en_us/training/student-training/viewing-originality-reports http://turnitin.com/en_us/training/student-training/about-originalitycheck
TurnitIn is only a tool and judgement needs to
be used when you view your Originality Report. TurnitIn does not make a
judgement as to what is referenced properly, it highlights the non-original
material in a piece of work. You should use the similarity score as a guide
only and must then check the originality report to determine whether or not
changes need to be made to the assessment.
Required Students must familiarise themselves with the
following policies and procedures at http://policy.cqu.edu.au:
Assessment and examination policy and procedures
- Assessment of Coursework Policy
Assessment of Coursework Principles
Assessment of Coursework Procedures
HRMT20024
Assessment 2 Rubric – Annotated Bibliography
Key Criteria
|
Exceeds Expectations
|
Exceeds Expectations
|
Meets Expectations
|
Meets Expectations
|
Below Expectations
|
||||||||||
(High Distinction) 85-100%
|
(Distinction) 75 - 84%
|
(Credit) 65 – 74%
|
(Pass) 50 – 64%
|
(Fail) below 50%
|
|||||||||||
Research
|
Utilises
5 excellent sources that
|
Utilises
5 very good sources
|
Utilises
5 sources that are
|
Utilises
5 sources that are
|
Utilises
sources that are not
|
||||||||||
40%
|
are
current, from credible
|
that
are current, credible, and
|
current
and appropriate for use
|
somewhat
relevant for
|
sufficient
in quantity, quality or
|
||||||||||
sources
and highly relevant to
|
relevant
to Assessment 3.
|
in
Assessment 3.
|
Assessment
3.
|
relevance
to Assessment 3
|
|||||||||||
Assessment
3.
|
|||||||||||||||
The
assessment presents a
|
The
assessment presents a
|
The
assessment presents a
|
The
assessment provides
|
The
assessment fails to provide
|
|||||||||||
detailed
and focused summary
|
fairly
detailed and focused
|
somewhat
detailed and focused
|
limited
detail with no clear
|
any
clear evidence of the ideas
|
|||||||||||
of
the ideas presented (para 1),
|
summary
of the ideas
|
summary
of the ideas
|
summary
of the ideas
|
presented
(para 1)
|
|||||||||||
demonstrating
a high level
|
presented
(para 1)
|
presented
(para 1)
|
presented
(para 1)
|
||||||||||||
ability
to identify HRM
|
|||||||||||||||
strategies
and practices
|
|||||||||||||||
Argument 30%
|
Excellent
and logical argument
|
Strong
argument about the
|
Some
argument about the
|
Weak
argument and no
|
Little
or no argument (para 2)
|
||||||||||
about
the value of each article
|
value
of each article to the
|
value
of each article to the
|
discussion
of the contemporary
|
or
little relevance to the HRM
|
|||||||||||
to
the contemporary HRM
|
contemporary
HRM issues in
|
contemporary
HRM issues
|
HRM
issues in Assessment 3,
|
issues
in Assessment 3, and
|
|||||||||||
issues
in Assessment 3 topic,
|
Assessment
3 topic and very
|
Assessment
3 topic andvgood
|
and/or
limited identification of
|
little
or no identification of the
|
|||||||||||
and
excellent identification of
|
good
identification of the issues
|
identification
of the issues for
|
the
issues for your selected
|
issues
for your selected sector.
|
|||||||||||
the
issues for your selected
|
for
your selected sector (para
|
your
selected sector (para 2)
|
sector
(para 2)
|
||||||||||||
sector
(para 2)
|
2)
|
||||||||||||||
Structure
|
The
ideas are arranged in an
|
The
ideas are arranged in a
|
The
ideas are arranged in a
|
The
ideas appear less logical,
|
There
is little, if any, coherent
|
||||||||||
15%
|
extremely
logical, structured
|
fairly
logical, structured and
|
logical,
some-what structured
|
structured
and presents in fairly
|
structure
to the document.
|
||||||||||
and
coherent manner.
|
coherent
manner.
|
and
coherent manner.
|
incoherent
manner.
|
||||||||||||
Presentation and quality of
|
Quality
of writing at a very high
|
Quality
of writing is of a high
|
Quality
of writing is of a good
|
Some
problems with sentence
|
Quality
of writing is at a very
|
||||||||||
writing
|
standard.
|
standard.
|
standard.
|
structure
and presentation
|
poor
standard so barely
|
||||||||||
15%
|
Correct
grammar, spelling and
|
Few
grammar, spelling and
|
Few
grammar, spelling and
|
Frequent
grammar, punctuation
|
understandable.
|
||||||||||
punctuation.
|
punctuation
mistakes.
|
punctuation
mistakes.
|
and
spelling mistakes. Use of
|
Many
spelling mistakes. Little
|
|||||||||||
inappropriate
language.
|
or
no evidence of proof
|
||||||||||||||
reading.
|
|||||||||||||||
Late assessment penalty
|
5%
per day x 30 marks = 1.5 marks per day
|
||||||||||||||
Comments
Post a Comment