Network Application Management
Assessment Details and Submission
Guidelines
|
||||||||
Trimester
|
T2 2018
|
|||||||
Unit Code
|
MN504
|
|||||||
Unit Title
|
Networked Application Management
|
|||||||
Assessment
|
Group Assignment
|
|||||||
Type
|
||||||||
Assessment
|
Network Analysis using Wireshark
|
|||||||
Title
|
||||||||
Purpose of the
|
This assignment is designed to develop
deeper analytical understanding of
|
|||||||
assessment
|
different
distributed network conditions. At the completion of this assessment
|
|||||||
(with
|
ULO
|
students
should be able to:
|
||||||
Mapping)
|
d. Analyse performance and deployment issues
for networked applications;
|
|||||||
e. Compare
appropriate industry tools
and techniques to
manage
|
||||||||
networked
applications;
|
||||||||
Word limit
|
2000
|
|||||||
Submission
|
All work must be submitted on Moodle
by the due date along with a title
|
|||||||
Guidelines
|
Page.
|
|||||||
The assignment must be in MS Word
format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body)
|
||||||||
font and 2.54
cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate
|
||||||||
section
headings.
|
||||||||
Reference sources must be cited in the
text of the report, and listed
|
||||||||
appropriately
at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
|
||||||||
Extension
|
If an extension of time to submit work
is required, a Special Consideration
|
|||||||
Application
must be submitted directly on AMS. You
must submit this
|
||||||||
application
three working days prior to the due date of the assignment.
|
||||||||
Further
information is available at:
|
||||||||
procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
|
||||||||
Academic
|
Academic Misconduct is a serious
offence. Depending on the seriousness of
|
|||||||
Misconduct
|
the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to
exclusion
|
|||||||
from the
course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves
|
||||||||
familiar with
the full policy
and procedure available
at:
|
||||||||
Procedure For further information, please refer to the Academic
Integrity
|
||||||||
Section in
your Unit Description.
|
Assignment Description
The
aim of the assignment is to develop an analytical understanding of performance
and management of different types of networked applications. The assignment
will provide an opportunity to understand network performance and management
issues of networked applications using state of the art tools. These exercises
provide an opportunity to demonstrate analytical ability of evaluating
distributed systems performance, Quality of Service and service management.
Overview and General Instructions of Assignment
Students
need to form a group of two in their own lab class and inform tutor about their
group during Week 7 Lab. Each group will need to capture packets on their home
network and at MIT while accessing the following websites. One website is of a
news channel and the other one is a website for live streaming. The students
are required to capture packets of multiple images from the news channel
website and capture packets from the live stream website while streaming for 10
minutes once at MIT in a group and then on their home network individually. So
at the end there will be six trace files, three for each website, two captured
on MIT network and four on students’ home networks.
The websites to
access are:
http://www.lightfm.com.au
http:// iview.abc.net.au
The complete report must
be submitted on Moodle within due date. The report has following four main
parts:
Part 1:
The
first part of the report should be about general statistics of all six captures
using Wireshark that must include:
1.
Start
time of capture
2.
Total
number of captured packets for each protocol
3.
Total
Number of lost packets
4.
IP
addresses of the client and server
Part 2:
The
second part of the report must include screen shots of packet capture,
screenshots of different statistics from Wireshark and complete analysis of
those screenshots for both websites for all three networks. Only screenshots of the graphs or other statistics will not get any marks as
those must be analysed in detail to discuss the quality of service for a
particular application. The students are required to analyse the network performance for the assigned websites
considering following aspects:
1.
Throughput
2.
Round
Trip Time
3. Packet
Loss
While
collecting statistics please make sure, you are looking at the right flow as
your Wireshark file may have packets from other applications and flows as well.
Figure 1 on next page shows the throughput graph generated by Wireshark and
source and destination addresses are clearly shown. You need to collect
statistics for flows which are from server to client.
Part 3:
The
third part of the report is about comparing the collected Wireshark statistics
of the two different networked applications on three different networks. The
throughput graphs and TCP retransmission statistics for web page transfer and
live streaming (provided in part 2) need to be compared with each other and for
all three networks. The differences of the performance to be identified and
reasons must be provided for such differences.
Part 4:
Students
need to download, install, use and compare another free network performance
measurement tool from the Internet on their home computer. One possible option
is Microsoft Message Analyzer from https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/download/details.aspx?id=44226. The tool should be used to
analyse the network
traffic captured while accessing one of the news websites mentioned in Table 1.
The chosen tool should be compared with Wireshark on the basis of following
criteria:
1. Ease
of access and use: how easy it is to download, install and start using (any
changes to be made to the system etc.) as compared to Wireshark
2.
GUI:
Compare at least four GUI features of the chosen tool with Wireshark
3. Visualisation
of traffic: After capturing packets by the chosen tool the effectiveness of the
visualisation of the network traffic should be compared with Wireshark.
4. Statistics
generation: At least one statistics like throughput, RTT etc. needs to be
generated by the chosen tool and to be compared with the same generated by
Wireshark.
The comparison must
include screenshots for both tools (your chosen tool and Wireshark) to judge
the validity of the comparison.
Marking criteria:
Section to be included in
|
Description of
the section
|
Marks
|
|
the report
|
|||
Introduction
|
Outline of the assignment
|
4
|
|
Overall
structure of the report
|
|||
General Statistics
|
For each capture following should be
discussed:
|
9
|
|
1.
|
Time of capture
|
||
2.
|
Total
number of captured packets
|
||
3.
|
IP
addresses of client and server
|
||
Network Performance
|
Screenshots and analysis of the
following:
|
5 x 3 = 15
|
|
1.
|
Throughput
|
||
2.
|
Round
Trip Time
|
||
3.
|
Packet
Loss
|
||
Comparison 1
|
Comparison of the throughput and TCP
retransmissions
|
5 x 3 = 15
|
|
of
both applications on three networks and discussion of
|
|||
the
reasons for the difference.
|
|||
Comparison 2
|
Comparison of the chosen tool with
Wireshark in terms
|
3 x 4 = 12
|
|
of:
|
|||
1.
|
Ease
of access and use
|
||
2.
|
GUI
|
||
3.
|
Visualisation
of traffic
|
||
4.
|
Statistics
generation
|
||
The
screenshots for both tools should be provided
|
|||
Conclusion
|
Complete summary of the report
specially the
|
3
|
|
comparison.
|
|||
Reference style
|
Follow IEEE reference style.
|
2
|
|
Total
|
60
|
||
Comments
Post a Comment