Contracts and Procurement
Assessment 1
Assessment
|
Assessment 1:
Contracts and Procurement Case Study –
|
|||
Report – Review
of new Royal Adelaide Hospital Auditor
|
||||
General Report
(and associated Learning Resources),
|
||||
including
detailed analysis of findings.
|
||||
Individual/Group
|
Individual Report and Reflection
Journal
|
|||
Length
|
Report
Format approximately 2,400 words
|
|||
Total Marks
|
40
marks
|
|||
Context:
General
Procurement
and contracts are integral to successful project management. Planning for
purchases and acquisitions, requests for proposal, vendor selection, contract
administration, and contract closure are integral parts of the process.
Learning from Case Studies and benchmarking against better practices, standards
and excellence is vital to understand complexity of issues and successful
strategies for procurement and contract management. It will also ensure improved
responsiveness to key issues, promote supplier-client relationships through
proactive management of risks and ultimately deliver higher level of focus on
performance-based outcomes.
Specific (Assessment 1 Context)
Assessment
1 is about uncovering complexities in the procurement context generally,
identifying key issues, looking at leadership, governance and key themes that
will allow improved focus, reflection and learning.
Assessment 1 -
Individual Report (overall 2,400 Words)
based on review Case
Study (new Royal Adelaide Hospital
AG Report) and other module Learning Resources.
Students are
encouraged to look at the Essential and Highly Recommended Learning Resources and
other public documents associated with the new Royal Adelaide Hospital.
However, a careful thorough review of the South Australian Auditor General
Report for
2015
is required to understand the contracts and procurement issues that have arisen
during the execution of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital project, ongoing risks mitigations
and lessons learnt that can be applied to other large infrastructure projects.
Assessment 1 aims to encourage a deeper understanding of the challenges faced
in large complex projects – particularly with procurement methods that involve
private-sector finance to deliver complex projects – which is a significant
method of procurement because it can mobilise global financial and procurement
capability to innovatively build public infrastructure and facilities to meet
the needs of the growing population.Students are also encouraged to understand
and explore the related organisational issues, stakeholders and the funding and
finance aspects associated with the new Royal Adelaide Hospital project.
Instructions:
Assessment 1 is
designed around the review of a Case Study from a current
large-scale public private
partnership hospital project that aims to create a modern health-care facility
in South Australia. This assessment comprises of four parts:
Part
A: 600 Words Introduction summarising the procurement context (life cycle
journey and where the project is currently), uncover complexities (and key
issues), discuss project environment and organisation aspects, leadership and governance
and how that
has
influenced the current situation.
Part
B: 700 Words Identify key risks, mitigations and possible learnings. Where
learnings have wider implications, identify how those learnings may require
changes to roles and responsibilities of key project resources, changes to
procurement briefs or specifications, scope and the procurement process itself.
Identify dependencies and common themes.
Part C: 600 Words – Summary of key
findings and also identify best practices for procurement and contracts
management (in particular PPP procurement) and explore roles of project and
procurement managers in ensuring successful delivery.
Part
D: Nominal word limit of 500 words. The Reflection Journal summarises the
student’s ideas and thoughts and key aspects pertaining to Module 1 and Module
2 including any key aspects picked-up as a result of the review of the
Essential and Highly Recommended Learning Resources and critical self-assessment
of how some aspects may apply to student’s current or future roles.
Important Note: The
research effort put-in by students in Assessment 1 is vital input for
Assessment 2 and Assessment 3 as it will provide actionable information for
better participation in the discussion board as well as within Groups.
It is recommended that
students Reflection Journal also cover some of the topics below – which will
help students for Assessment 2:
Typical
procurement and financial risks require to be managed for complex projects;
Specific financial risks that remain for the nRAH project to completion (use
initiative and judgement);
Possible
mitigation actions and how these relate to better practice guidelines published
by State Procurement Board of South Australia;
Areas
for further vendor negotiations and management - to achieve successful contract
completion.
Areas
of key accountability for Project Manager and Procurement Manager to facilitate
successful outcomes; Areas performance-based contracting and its application to
nRAH contract management or completions effort generally;
Possible
Issues that can be considered by the Group/Team for Group Report or Group
Presentation;
Possible
team/group behaviours that the individuals will display to develop the Group
Report or Group Presentation.
In
considering the above, please be mindful of, and reflect on, the findings and
the lessons learnt from the case study and how they can be applied in your own
personal development and professional career. Record these in your Reflection
Journal and also highlight any specific instances where your strengths and
limitations as a project manager or manager have been identified.
Assessment
Criteria:
Assessment
1 (Parts A, B, C and D inclusive) Individual Report (40%)
Content,
audience and purpose (30%) Knowledge and understanding (30%)
Correct
citation of key resources and evidence (20%) Effective communication (20%)
The
Reflection Journal will also be assessed and has a weight of 10% out of 40%. In
addition, students may wish to consider that the audience for the Reflection
Journal is the Learning Facilitator and or the student’s employer or sponsor.
Therefore, effective communication of ideas is vital recognising the audience
too. See learning rubrics in the following pages for details.
To get solution visit our website www.sourceessay.com
Comments
Post a Comment