HRMT
Assessment 1 Presentation guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Task
|
|
Select a
topic. On-campus
students will nominate for a topic in class in Week 2. Only 3-4
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
presentations can be held each week,
and the Lecturer will re-allocate students as required for
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
an even distribution. Distance
students should advise the course coordinator by email
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
HRM topics are as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 4 HR planning
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 5 Recruitment and selection
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 6 Employee relations challenges
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 7 Managing diversity and
work-life balance
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 8 Performance management
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 9 Learning, development and
career management
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 10 Motivation, rewards and
compensation
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 11 Employee turnover and
retention
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Week 12 Evaluating and improving the
HRM function
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Select
two articles for your presentation. Start gathering ideas for your topic with a review
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
of a relevant textbook chapter and
the references at the end of the chapter. Identify two (2)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
good quality journal articles from
the CQU library databases and business press publications
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
such as Harvard Business Review. The
articles must have been published within the last five
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
years. Critically analyse the chosen
articles to identify a key theme for current research and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
thinking on your topic, rather than
simply summarizing the articles.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Design
your presentation. Creatively
design your presentation with the aim to engage your
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
class on the latest thinking research
on your HRM topic. Presentation is to be a maximum of
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
eight (8)
minutes with a maximum of six (6) PowerPoint slides. For each article, you
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
should communicate : the title,
topic, objective of the research, method for the research,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
argument/findings, and Conclusion.
Your presentation should also include a discussion of the
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
contribution of both articles to the
field. (Distance students record a voiceover on powerpoint)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Upload
your slides before the presentation. Your powerpoint slides should be uploaded
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
before your presentation, to assist
with prompt marking. You should also provide your
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
lecturer/tutor with a printed copy of
the PowerPoint slides including a separate page for the
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
references.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Referencing
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Plagiarism
|
|
Copy detection software (TurnitIn) is
used in this course and work found in contravention of the
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
copying and plagiarism rules will be
investigated. Penalties apply in the case of proven
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
instances of copying, plagiarism and
academic dishonesty. Please check the following links to
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
TurnitIn is only a tool and judgement
needs to be used when you view your Originality Report.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
TurnitIn does not make a judgement as
to what is referenced properly, it highlights the non-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
original material in a piece of work.
You should use the similarity score as a guide only and
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
must then check the originality
report to determine whether or not changes need to be made to
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
the assessment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Required
|
|
Students must familiarise themselves
with the following policies and procedures at
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Principles; Assessment of Coursework
Procedures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Note: This is an illustration of the marking criteria that will be
used in the Turnitin system. To see your marks on the criteria, open your
assessment through Turnitin and click on the marking criteria button.The
markers will provide feedback throughout your assessment in the ‘Grademark’ view in Turnitin. You can access
this by clicking on the small blue pencil icon next to your assessment
submission.
While there is no set rule for what your similarity index
should be, you should aim for a similarity score that is less than 20%. It is
possible that you could have a higher level if you have a very long reference
list though. The main thing to look out for is WHERE the similarity is being
shown. If there is a high level of similarity found in the body of the
assessment, you will probably lose marks for not presenting your own ideas. A
high level of similarity in the body of your assessment may significantly
affect your marks for each of the criteria, as marks are given based on
original text and appropriately referenced text only. It is suggested that you
reduce the use of direct quotes from other sources wherever possible. Markers
will analyse the similarity score reported by Turnitin on a case by case basis.
Key
Criteria
|
0
(Not Shown)
|
2
(Poor)
|
3
(Unsatisfactory)
|
4
(Satisfactory)
|
5
(Good)
|
6
(Very Good)
|
7
(Excellent)
|
|
Introduction
(10%)
|
No introduction.
|
No topic, key points and/or
|
Topic introduced, but the
|
Topic, key points and
|
Topic, key points and
|
Topic, key points and
|
Topic, key points and
|
|
|
|
purpose is introduced or the
|
introduction is
|
purpose of the presentation
|
purpose of the presentation
|
purpose of the presentation
|
purpose of the presentation
|
|
|
|
introduction is irrelevant to
|
underdeveloped in terms of
|
is introduced with
|
is introduced in a clear and
|
is introduced in a clear and
|
is introduced in an
|
|
|
|
assessment item.
|
key points and/or purpose of
|
satisfactory clarity.
|
interesting way.
|
interesting way which
|
exceptional and interesting
|
|
|
|
|
presentation.
|
|
|
captures the audience's
|
way which effectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attention.
|
captures the audience's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attention.
|
|
Knowledge
of Content
|
No knowledge nor
|
Inaccurate knowledge of the
|
Insufficient knowledge of the
|
Demonstrates satisfactory
|
Demonstrates above
|
Demonstrates good
|
Demonstrates a
|
|
(30%)
|
understanding of the HRM
|
HRM topic. Irrelevant
|
HRM topic. Information
|
knowledge of the HRM topic.
|
average knowledge of the
|
knowledge of the HRM topic
|
comprehensive and highly
|
|
topic.
|
information presented. Poor
|
appears to be randomly
|
Information from existing
|
HRM topic. Relevant
|
with insight and depth.
|
insightful knowledge of the
|
||
|
||||||||
|
|
understanding of information
|
chosen and not related to
|
thinking in HRM presented
|
information presented from
|
Accurate, interesting, and
|
HRM topic. Highly relevant
|
|
|
|
and concepts presented.
|
material covered in the unit.
|
and explained. Satisfactory
|
latest thinking research in
|
relevant information
|
and informative material and
|
|
|
|
|
Limited understanding of
|
understanding of information
|
HRM. Above average
|
presented from latest
|
evidence presented from
|
|
|
|
|
information and concepts
|
and concepts presented.
|
understanding of information
|
thinking research in HRM.
|
latest thinking research in
|
|
|
|
|
presented.
|
|
and concepts presented.
|
Well-developed
|
HRM. Highly developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
understanding of Information
|
understanding of information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and concepts presented.
|
and concepts presented.
|
|
Presentation
Delivery
|
No ability to present.
|
Ideas on the HRM topic is
|
Ideas on the HRM topic is
|
Ideas on the HRM topic are
|
Ideas on the HRM topic are
|
Ideas on the HRM topic are
|
Ideas on the HRM topic are
|
|
(30%)
|
|
disorganized and not
|
unclear and not in a logical
|
satisfactorily organised with
|
presented in an organised
|
presented effectively and
|
clearly and professionally
|
|
|
|
coherent. Pace is highly
|
way. Pace is inappropriate.
|
clarity in parts, pacing
|
way, though lack clarity in
|
expressed in an organised
|
articulated, presented
|
|
|
|
inappropriate. The student's
|
The student's voice is: not
|
adequate, though may be
|
parts, adequately paced. The
|
way, appropriately paced.
|
effectively in an organised
|
|
|
|
voice is: not clear; not
|
clear at times; not expressive
|
over-or under length. The
|
student’s voice is clear and
|
The student has a clear
|
way, and are appropriately
|
|
|
|
expressive and/or the
|
and/or the student
|
student’s voice is clear and
|
expressive for most of the
|
voice, and expressive during
|
paced. The student has a
|
|
|
|
student pronounces a
|
pronounces occasionally
|
expressive at times during
|
presentation.
|
the presentation.
|
clear voice, exceptionally
|
|
|
|
number of terms incorrectly.
|
some terms incorrectly.
|
the presentation.
|
|
|
expressive during the whole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
(10%)
|
No conclusions provided.
|
Brief conclusion but no links
|
Brief conclusion with limited
|
The conclusion provided
|
The conclusion provided
|
Clear and concise summary
|
Clear and concise summary
|
|
|
|
established to the
|
links established to the
|
some links to the introduction
|
links to the introduction and
|
of the presentation with links
|
with effective links to the
|
|
|
|
introduction and body of the
|
introduction and body of the
|
and body of the presentation,
|
body of the presentation, but
|
to the introduction and body
|
introduction and body of the
|
|
|
|
presentation.
|
presentation.
|
but was not concise or
|
was not concise or unclear at
|
of the presentation.
|
presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
unclear.
|
times.
|
|
|
|
Visual
Aids (20%)
|
No visual aids are used.
|
The visual aids are poorly
|
Limited visual aids are used
|
The visual aids are
|
The visual aids are well
|
The visual aids are well
|
The visual aids are well
|
|
|
|
designed or unrelated to the
|
and inappropriately
|
satisfactorily designed and at
|
designed and adequately
|
designed, confidently used
|
designed and confidently
|
|
|
|
message presented.
|
designed.
|
times support the
|
support the presentation.
|
and effectively support the
|
used, which effectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
presentation.
|
|
presentation.
|
support and add impact to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the presentation.
|
Comments
Post a Comment