Systems Thinking
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title : MGT603: Systems Thinking
Title Assessment : Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words)
Part A: Critique Individual (250 words)
Length: Up to 500 words
Weighting : Part A 20%
Part B 20%
Subject Code and Title : MGT603: Systems Thinking
Title Assessment : Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words)
Part A: Critique Individual (250 words)
Length: Up to 500 words
Weighting : Part A 20%
Part B 20%
Systems
Thinking requires you to take a holistic view of the world we live in and the
organisations we work with. This assessment has been prescribed to appraise
students’ ability to think holistically and generate discussion around
recognizing and understanding organisational operations using a Systems
Thinking lens. The assessment will broaden your knowledge of and appreciation
for using a different approach to look for and solve problems faced by managers
in contemporary organisations.
This assessment
has been designed to
• Appraise your
ability to academically research and evaluate paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualization and apply to
contemporary business issues.
• You
are expected to utilize the literature provided in Modules 1 to 3.1 in your
analysis and discussion, and are required to apply critical thinking,
presenting multi-sided findings.
• Successful
completion of this assessment will help you to further understand Systems
Thinking in a practical context. It will also help you to maintain currency in
the increasingly changing industry.
Guidelines
There
are two (2) parts to Assessment 1. For an acceptable result, you will complete Part A and Part B of the Assessment. Using the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum
provided, students are required to
Part A: Proposal Individual (500 words)
Instructions:
Identify
a local or global organisation that is currently facing significant issues and
critically analyse how a Systems Thinking approach can assist in making optimal
decisions. For example:
• You are working as operations manager in
a company of your choice. This company has been in business for almost 10 years
and is now being confronted with many operational issues related to inventory
management. Sometimes there is excess stock and other times shortage of the
inventory that are hearting the bottom line performance of the company. In
addition to that new competitors and demand from customers to deliver faster
and cheaper require organization a different approach rather than just solving
the inventory problems. Or
• You are working in XYZ bank in your home
country that has been struggling with significant loss of customers to
competitors. To overcome the problem, the bank has introduced an incentive
system for its employees to bring in new customers.
Once
you have chosen your organisation and connected issue you are then required to
prepare and post in the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum at least one (1) original
post identifying intended or unintended consequences on various stakeholders of
their chosen organisation and then recommend/propose alternative
policies/procedures using Systems Thinking approach to help overcome the
problem. Key points to consider in your initial post:
•
Your
proposal should be holistic
•
You
must include reference to Systems Thinking literature
•
Consider
using Systems Thinking tools such as Rich Picture and CATWOE etc.
Students
are also required to provide a brief rationale of why it is important to use
Systems Thinking and relevant tools and techniques to solve the identified
organisational problem to minimize adverse consequences.
Please
ensure your original posts are in the discussion forum by the end of Module 2 (week 4)
Referencing:
It
is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing
research. Please see more information on referencing here
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Part B: Critique Individual (250 words)
Instructions:
Each
student is required to critique an original post (Part A) of two (2)
peers. Your Critique should include commentary on
• Whether the original post is holistic.
Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback.
• Have
all plausible consequences been identified?
• Have Systems Thinking tools been used
and used properly? Please provide a critique on these tools and there use in
solving the problem identified.
Please
ensure your critique posts are in the discussion forum by the end of Module 3 (week 5)
Referencing:
It
is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing
research. Please see more information on referencing here
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Student
must actively seek feedback and inputs from peers and facilitator. The
individual student should organise discussion notes and upload it on the
Blackboard accordingly.
Please note the following additional information
• This assessment is designed to create
robust discussion around Systems Thinking with your peers. Please feel free to
post more than what is specified to broaden your understanding and appreciation
of the topic
• While presenting your views, you are
required to support claims either with the relevant experience or with the
published literature. This includes journal articles, relevant website links,
news article, magazines or text from related books.
• The views could be supporting comments
or they may be a contradiction, but you need to provide appropriate
justification as specified above.
• If referring to published literature to
support stated views, you are required to provide relevant reference (and
citation) in the response. If you can provide appropriate articles to support
opinion, it will be valued considerably.
• Along with actively participating in the
discussions, it is equally important to provide responses, which are relevant
and add value to the discussion. The quality of response will be considered as
one of the most important criteria for evaluating students in Assessment 1,
Part B.
To get solution visit our website www.sourceessay.com
Comments
Post a Comment